2 September 01, 2016
1.
Articles and Statements
2. Fedor I. Girenok
Idea of Absurdity in A. Vvedensky's Philosophical Poetry and Dramatic Art
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 56-61.
Number of views: 1770 Download in PDF
3. Sergey A. LebedevEuropean Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 56-61.
Abstract:
In article the concept of absurdity of Alexander Vvedensky's poetry is analyzed. The author draws a conclusion that the consciousness is necessary for the person not for knowledge, and for suffering. And also to fill the emptiness with hallucinations. Unlike the French existentialism Vvedensky understands absurdity not as absurd, an illogicality, and as denial of metaphysical deafness at the person. The absurdity is a unique opportunity not to be the deaf among become deaf. In article the dramatic art of the play «Fir-tree at Ivanov» is analyzed. The author notes that the structure of desire of the person differs in nothing from desires at animals. In the play anybody deceives nobody because deception is possible in the knowledge horizon. And this horizon as the author notes, just and isn't enough for heroes of the play. But isn't present in the play and a hint on self-deception. All tell only the truth, but anybody in anything doesn't trust. In article the special attention is paid to idea of a madhouse of Vvedensky. It is noted that to be the madman, it is optional to go crazy. For this purpose it is necessary to remember what wasn't, and to forget that was. The madman not the one who calls himself the madman, and the one who will be called the madman by the doctor. The author draws a conclusion that time is a way of the existence doubled, which isn't coinciding with itself the person. Affecting itself, we always create time in which there are values and ghosts.
In article the concept of absurdity of Alexander Vvedensky's poetry is analyzed. The author draws a conclusion that the consciousness is necessary for the person not for knowledge, and for suffering. And also to fill the emptiness with hallucinations. Unlike the French existentialism Vvedensky understands absurdity not as absurd, an illogicality, and as denial of metaphysical deafness at the person. The absurdity is a unique opportunity not to be the deaf among become deaf. In article the dramatic art of the play «Fir-tree at Ivanov» is analyzed. The author notes that the structure of desire of the person differs in nothing from desires at animals. In the play anybody deceives nobody because deception is possible in the knowledge horizon. And this horizon as the author notes, just and isn't enough for heroes of the play. But isn't present in the play and a hint on self-deception. All tell only the truth, but anybody in anything doesn't trust. In article the special attention is paid to idea of a madhouse of Vvedensky. It is noted that to be the madman, it is optional to go crazy. For this purpose it is necessary to remember what wasn't, and to forget that was. The madman not the one who calls himself the madman, and the one who will be called the madman by the doctor. The author draws a conclusion that time is a way of the existence doubled, which isn't coinciding with itself the person. Affecting itself, we always create time in which there are values and ghosts.
Number of views: 1770 Download in PDF
Contemporary Philosophy of Science: Object, Subject and Structure
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 62-76.
Number of views: 1766 Download in PDF
4. Sergey A. LebedevEuropean Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 62-76.
Abstract:
In contrast to the classical philosophy of science the contemporary philosophy of science understands its object, subject and structure more widely. It does not bring philosophical perspectives of science only to the analysis of the process of scientific cognition, its structure and methods. It considers science more broadly, namely as a socio-cognitive activity which is innovative and practical. The object of classical philosophy of science was an ideal science, a science that it should be from the standpoint of philosophy. The object of the modern philosophy of science is a real science and its history. The subject of classical philosophy of science was the process of scientific inquiry, focused on obtaining true knowledge. Therefore, the central problem was the problem of the scientific method, is able to guarantee to provide such knowledge. The subject of the modern philosophy of science is science as a socio-cognitive and innovative system aimed at the application of scientific knowledge in practice. The structure of the classical philosophy of science was subordinated to the disclosure of the structure of scientific knowledge, its various levels and methods of getting each of them the true knowledge. The structure of the contemporary philosophy of science is subordinated to the description of all of the main measurements of the actual functioning of science (ontological, epistemological, socio-cultural, axiological, anthropological, innovative) in their unit. Empirical materials regarding the actual functioning of science and its history is considered in modern philosophy not as the sum of examples to prove this or that philosophical epistemology, but also as a basis and criterion of reasonable choice of the most general theoretical models of science.
In contrast to the classical philosophy of science the contemporary philosophy of science understands its object, subject and structure more widely. It does not bring philosophical perspectives of science only to the analysis of the process of scientific cognition, its structure and methods. It considers science more broadly, namely as a socio-cognitive activity which is innovative and practical. The object of classical philosophy of science was an ideal science, a science that it should be from the standpoint of philosophy. The object of the modern philosophy of science is a real science and its history. The subject of classical philosophy of science was the process of scientific inquiry, focused on obtaining true knowledge. Therefore, the central problem was the problem of the scientific method, is able to guarantee to provide such knowledge. The subject of the modern philosophy of science is science as a socio-cognitive and innovative system aimed at the application of scientific knowledge in practice. The structure of the classical philosophy of science was subordinated to the disclosure of the structure of scientific knowledge, its various levels and methods of getting each of them the true knowledge. The structure of the contemporary philosophy of science is subordinated to the description of all of the main measurements of the actual functioning of science (ontological, epistemological, socio-cultural, axiological, anthropological, innovative) in their unit. Empirical materials regarding the actual functioning of science and its history is considered in modern philosophy not as the sum of examples to prove this or that philosophical epistemology, but also as a basis and criterion of reasonable choice of the most general theoretical models of science.
Number of views: 1766 Download in PDF
History and Philosophy of Science: Main Stages and Paradigmаs
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 77-90.
Number of views: 1825 Download in PDF
5. G.W. OesterdiekhoffEuropean Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 77-90.
Abstract:
The article reconstructed the content of the main stages and the main concepts of philosophy of science in its historical development. The two historical stages of the development of philosophy of science are: "metaphysical" and positive. In the first stage, the philosophy of science was immanent part of the philosophy as a theoretical form of world outlook, namely the philosophical theory of scientific knowledge, or "epistemology". In the second stage of its evolution, philosophy of science became part of the consciousness of the science in its endeavor to realize its objectives, the facilities and grounds. In the second stage, the philosophy of science has evolved through three States: classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical. Each of them was represented by a number of alternative conceptions or paradigms. The most complete and adequate of them were positive-dialectical paradigm. It is based on the recognition of the fundamentally contradictory nature of both the structure of science and scientific knowledge, and its development.
The article reconstructed the content of the main stages and the main concepts of philosophy of science in its historical development. The two historical stages of the development of philosophy of science are: "metaphysical" and positive. In the first stage, the philosophy of science was immanent part of the philosophy as a theoretical form of world outlook, namely the philosophical theory of scientific knowledge, or "epistemology". In the second stage of its evolution, philosophy of science became part of the consciousness of the science in its endeavor to realize its objectives, the facilities and grounds. In the second stage, the philosophy of science has evolved through three States: classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical. Each of them was represented by a number of alternative conceptions or paradigms. The most complete and adequate of them were positive-dialectical paradigm. It is based on the recognition of the fundamentally contradictory nature of both the structure of science and scientific knowledge, and its development.
Number of views: 1825 Download in PDF
Psychological Stage Development and the History of Philosophy
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 91-105.
Number of views: 1984 Download in PDF
6. Natalya N. RostovaEuropean Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 91-105.
Abstract:
Historians of philosophy often raised the question whether or not there has been a general trend or a general direction identifiable in the history of philosophy. D´Holbach, Hegel, Comte, Brunschvicq, Cassirer, and Piaget belong to the list of those scholars who tried to describe the history of philosophy as a history of stages of mind. They all described the history of philosophy as a sequence of stages going from more concrete, simple, and childish patterns to more elaborated, systematic, abstract, and mature patterns. Piaget himself made many comparisons between ancient philosophy on the one side and childish stages on the other side, while he identified higher psychological stages only in the sciences and philosophy after 1650. His idea with this regard, supported by T. Kuhn and A. Koyré, has found a couple of followers who likewise contributed to the psychogenetic theory of the philosophy´s history. The new structure-genetic theory programme, however, emphasizes that not only the philosophical theories but also the psychological structures of the philosophers themselves went through the stages developmental psychology has found out. This article here distinguishes six stages identifiable within the history of philosophy: Mythos, archaic philosophy, Ionian philosophy, classical Greek philosophy, early modern philosophy, and modern philosophy, all of them describable in terms of developmental psychology.
Historians of philosophy often raised the question whether or not there has been a general trend or a general direction identifiable in the history of philosophy. D´Holbach, Hegel, Comte, Brunschvicq, Cassirer, and Piaget belong to the list of those scholars who tried to describe the history of philosophy as a history of stages of mind. They all described the history of philosophy as a sequence of stages going from more concrete, simple, and childish patterns to more elaborated, systematic, abstract, and mature patterns. Piaget himself made many comparisons between ancient philosophy on the one side and childish stages on the other side, while he identified higher psychological stages only in the sciences and philosophy after 1650. His idea with this regard, supported by T. Kuhn and A. Koyré, has found a couple of followers who likewise contributed to the psychogenetic theory of the philosophy´s history. The new structure-genetic theory programme, however, emphasizes that not only the philosophical theories but also the psychological structures of the philosophers themselves went through the stages developmental psychology has found out. This article here distinguishes six stages identifiable within the history of philosophy: Mythos, archaic philosophy, Ionian philosophy, classical Greek philosophy, early modern philosophy, and modern philosophy, all of them describable in terms of developmental psychology.
Number of views: 1984 Download in PDF
Analytical Painting of P. Filonov as a Step Towards to Death of the Person and Death of Art
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 106-112.
Number of views: 1760 Download in PDF
European Journal of Philosophical Research, 2016, Vol. (6), Is. 2, pp. 106-112.
Abstract:
Article is devoted to philosophy of painting of Pavel Filonov. The author analyzes installations of analytical art and their realization in concrete works of art. He pays attention that hidden which was a subject of analytical painting, there is visible of the world if to skin with it, to show its back, ontologically with it akin. Filonov is turned to scientific type of thinking. The science assumes ontology of the mind watching object which has no internal, hidden from the observer states. It deals with the world of a surface, with the world of bodies. This world loses a transcendental wrong side, and therefore Filonov's painting of an antimetafizichn. Filonov puts evolution to replace metaphysics. Not only God and the person within such approach are ontologically equal, but equal are the person and anything of the world, a person and an animal, the person and metal. To the place of a transtsendention Filonov puts idea of the world pulsing in the immanention. To the place of the constants which are a truth condition - the principle of formation. To the place of a phenomenon of «person» - the consciousness assimilating with the world. In Filonov's ontology the consciousness dissipates in the world, merges with it, becoming derivative of an unconscious body. Before the European philosophers of the XX century Filonov paves the way for idea of death of the person.
Article is devoted to philosophy of painting of Pavel Filonov. The author analyzes installations of analytical art and their realization in concrete works of art. He pays attention that hidden which was a subject of analytical painting, there is visible of the world if to skin with it, to show its back, ontologically with it akin. Filonov is turned to scientific type of thinking. The science assumes ontology of the mind watching object which has no internal, hidden from the observer states. It deals with the world of a surface, with the world of bodies. This world loses a transcendental wrong side, and therefore Filonov's painting of an antimetafizichn. Filonov puts evolution to replace metaphysics. Not only God and the person within such approach are ontologically equal, but equal are the person and anything of the world, a person and an animal, the person and metal. To the place of a transtsendention Filonov puts idea of the world pulsing in the immanention. To the place of the constants which are a truth condition - the principle of formation. To the place of a phenomenon of «person» - the consciousness assimilating with the world. In Filonov's ontology the consciousness dissipates in the world, merges with it, becoming derivative of an unconscious body. Before the European philosophers of the XX century Filonov paves the way for idea of death of the person.
Number of views: 1760 Download in PDF